Showing posts with label Investor's Business Daily. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Investor's Business Daily. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

IBD: NYT forgot reporting ... got scooped by Fox News

Investor's Business Daily zings the New York Times in today's editorial:
The New York Times, still smarting after losing scoops to Fox News, has thrown in the towel, vowing to avoid future embarrassment by monitoring the cable channel. We have a better idea — it's called reporting.
Zing!

IBD continued:
An Illinois senator rises to the highest office in the land on pillars of a spectacularly slimy political organization, a group with a long record of voter fraud, theft, thuggery and partisanship. As sexy as such a story might seem, the New York Times didn't consider it news.

That's why the Times got scooped by outlets such as Fox News, for which it has nothing but contempt, on revelations that led to the fall of community organizing behemoth Acorn.

The wound was self-inflicted, rooted in little more than the partisanship of protecting a favored president. It left the field clear for a couple of journalism students to show that Acorn staffers openly encouraged pimping, child prostitution, human trafficking, mortgage fraud and tax evasion.

It's right there on tapes posted to Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com. Unlike the disdainful Times, Fox ran with it, toppling a behemoth of political power.

Fox's judgment now seems to play the role the Times' once did, and the Times is no doubt left wondering how it could have lost out on yet another one.
Ouch, ouch, ouch.

It's call journalism. Too bad the MSM forgot that journalism includes fair and balanced reporting. Wonder if they will wake up anytime soon.

I'm not holding my breath.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Who are the REAL astroturfers?

As the saying goes, "Me thinks thou doeth protest too much." Even as the Democrat White House points a finger at ordinary Americans, trying to paint them as "angry mobs" and "organized groups," the Democrats are hiring paid rent-a-protesters to show up at townhall meetings. In The Real AstroTurf, Investor's Business Daily editorialized:
Free Speech: The White House and Congress claim the anti-ObamaCare uprising is artificially organized. But the violent — even racist — union counterattacks, urged on by Democrats, are the real Rent-a-Mobs.
The good news: it sounds as if citizens are not being deterred by strong-arm tactics from the White House, as shown at Sen. Arlen Spector's (D-PA) townhall meeting this morning where he faced another angry group of constituents.

Are the real astroturfers the ones advertising for paid protesters ... or the citizens who truly care about their country and their futures? The smoke-and-mirrors tactics of the left have not fooled anyone.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

IBD: "The President's Paygo Schtick"

From Investor's Business Daily:
Budget: Putting the federal budget on a "pay as you go" basis sounds fiscally reasonable, responsible even. But it's nothing of the sort. Rather, it's a gimmick intended to raise Americans' taxes to record levels.
Previous thoughts on this issue.

Friday, April 17, 2009

IBD: "One of the most extraordinary grass-roots uprisings in our history"

Billing it the "Tea Party System," Investor's Business Daily wrote that the hundreds of tea parties held nationwide on Wednesday were "part of one of the most extraordinary grass-roots uprisings in our history."

Recognizing what the liberals, the President, and many politicians have failed to see, IBD editorialized about the largest tax revolt ever, one that was held a mere three months after the election of Barack Obama:
Less than three months after a landmark election, throngs of demonstrators everywhere gathered to object to the revolution that our new president is steamrolling into law. It was a landmark protest in the history of the republic.

But how can the voices of tens if not hundreds of thousands of angry taxpayers be turned into concrete political action?

Investor's Business Daily attended one of these historic events, the Fishkill Tea Party in upstate New York, just east of the Hudson River. The original Fishkill Tea Party took place Aug. 26, 1776, when 100 women forced a storekeeper named Abram Brinckerhoff to sell them tea at the lawful price of 6 shillings per pound. This year's Fishkill Tea Party nearly filled Dutchess Stadium, the county's minor-league ballpark.

In a region of liberal New York state where Democrats have been consolidating their power during the last two elections, thousands traveled long distances to support pretty much the classic Reagan political agenda — and not just on taxes and spending.

Banners and placards sported slogans that included "Don't Spread My Wealth. Spread My Work Ethic," "Who'll Bail Me Out?" "Atlas Will Shrug," "Tea Today. No Kool-Aid," and "Acorn Didn't Have To Bus Us Here," referring to the left-wing activist group that specializes in voter registration drives benefiting liberal Democrats.
While the left has called tea party participants "radical," perhaps it would help if they listened to this Silent Majority who did something they normally do not do -- publicly demonstrate.
... [the crowd] rose from its seats for a speaker who called Washington's march toward socialism "a slap in the face to those who have served in the military."

It was quite clear, however, that the tea partiers feel betrayed by Republicans, not just the Democrats now in power in both the executive and legislative branches in Washington.
...
... the Republican brand is blemished.

During 12 years of dominance in Congress and eight years in the White House, the GOP failed to kick its addiction to pork and make tough decisions on controlling entitlement spending. It found it too politically risky to secure the U.S. borders — even in the post-9/11 years when homeland security trumped all other concerns.
Both parties need to pay attention as was evident by the recent real estate assessment tax revolt in Augusta County when 10,500 residents signed petitions, and 1,000 showed up at the Board of Supervisors meeting to protest their high assessments.

IBD ended by saying:
The tea party movement proves that even in the left-leaning Northeast, a huge natural constituency exists for these bread-and-butter American issues — lower taxes, less government, a strong military that's allowed to win, tough measures to end illegal immigration, term limits and family values.

It's all there, waiting to be tapped into — if only a few smart politicians would grasp the opportunity.
Something is happening in America ... it may not be politics as usual anymore.

Friday, November 02, 2007

Media are "sympathetic to Democrats and hostile to Republicans"

Was there any doubt that the mainstream media are more favorable to Democrats and push their liberal-leaning agenda? Investor's Business Daily reports on a study that proves the bias:
Just like so many reports before it, a joint survey by the Project for Excellence in Journalism and Harvard's Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy — hardly a bastion of conservative orthodoxy — found that in covering the current presidential race, the media are sympathetic to Democrats and hostile to Republicans.
Looking at morning news shows, newspapers, National Public Radio, and cable news outlets, the study found newspapers were the most biased:
The most flagrant bias, however, was found in newspapers. In reviewing front-page coverage in 11 newspapers, the study found the tone positive in nearly six times as many stories about Democrats as it was negative. ...

The study also discovered that newspaper stories "tended to be focused more on political matters and less on issues and ideas than the media overall. In all, 71% of newspaper stories concentrated on the 'game,' compared with 63% overall."
That is certainly true with the Misleader in Staunton.

The study concluded by stating:
The PEG-Shorenstein effort is only the latest to conclude that the mainstream media tilt left. Others include Stanley Rothman and Robert Lichter's groundbreaking 1986 book "The Media Elite"; "A Measure of Media Bias," a 2005 paper written by professors from UCLA and the University of Missouri; and Bernard Goldberg's two books, "Bias" and "Arrogance."

All underscore the media's leftward leanings. The media, of course, insist they are careful to keep personal opinions out of their coverage. But the facts tell another story — one that can't be edited or spiked.
Check out the article for other interesting and eye-opening comparisons.