Showing posts with label democrat hypocrisy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label democrat hypocrisy. Show all posts

Monday, September 06, 2010

Could Democrats lose it all in November?

Cross-posted at The Washington Examiner

Indications from many sources continue to suggest that November could be a sledge-hammer-to-the-forehead election for Democrats. Political pundits have watched as poll numbers have worsened even during this "summer of recovery," as it was billed by Democratic President Barack Obama ... but there appears to be no recovery in sight.

Democrat cheer leaders began the summer by publicly dismissing the doom-and-gloom predictions as they tried to rally the troops and Democratic candidates even as the President's approval rating dipped to 46% and three-quarters of those polled disapproved of Congress.

That "summer of recovery" has turned into the Summer of Economic Discontent, according to Michael Boskin, an economics professor at Stanford University, who wrote in the Wall Street Journal:
The Obama administration's "summer of recovery" has morphed into a summer of economic discontent amid anxiety over the weakening economy. The greater than 4% growth and less than 8% unemployment envisioned by the president's economic team are nowhere to be seen. Almost everything that is supposed to be up—the economic growth rate, the stock market, bond yields—is down. And almost everything that is supposed to be down—unemployment-insurance claims, new mortgage delinquencies—is up.
The rosy outlook Democrats had at the beginning of summer is not so rosy in September as some begin to realize they may be hit with a November landslide. Sean Trende wrote in Real Clear Politics:
There has been a flurry of political stories in recent weeks about the electoral difficulties Democrats face this fall. It seems Washington is finally catching on to the fact that the Democrats' hold on the House is in dire jeopardy, and that a 1994-style, 52-seat pickup is a real possibility.
"November is coming," as many like to point out. Things haven't worked out quite the way liberals thought they would, as noted by Michael Barone, senior political analyst at the Washington Examiner, who pointed out:
Scads of liberals gleefully predicted that the financial crisis and deep recession would destroy Americans' faith in markets and increase their confidence in Big Government. Many conservatives gloomily feared they were right.

Hasn't happened. If anything, public opinion has moved in the other direction, with most Americans rejecting the stimulus package and the health care bill, denying that government action is needed to address global warming, expressing negative feelings about labor unions.
Perhaps the most telling of all is from within the Obama administration itself. Dana Milbank at the Washington Post attended Wednesday's lunch at the National Press Club featuring the farewell speech of the departing Christina Romer, chairman of President Obama's Council of Economic Advisers. As Milbank described, Romer dished up indigestion for many with her report on the economy:
She had no idea how bad the economic collapse would be. She still doesn't understand exactly why it was so bad. The response to the collapse was inadequate. And she doesn't have much of an idea about how to fix things.
As soon as Obama was sworn in, Democrats pushed, shoved, and strong-armed their progressive agenda through Congress at break-neck speed, spending taxpayer money at a rate voters had not seen before. It was too much, too fast -- and alarmed Americans took action a mere two months into Obama's term by publicly protesting on the streets, something rarely seen in conservative ranks until 2009.

Perhaps the straw that broke the camel's back was the overwhelming, overreaching government-controlled health care reform bill, popularly called ObamaCare, that was passed in March. Over 2,000 pages long, the bill had not been read by many of the very Democrats who were pushing for its passage, an admittance that did not sit well with Americans who had been brought up to "read the fine print."

Questions from an alarmed electorate brought only dodging and weaving from Democrats, many who refused to hold town hall meetings or respond to phone calls from worried constituents who were arrogantly told they would learn the details after the bill was passed.

Late-night marathon sessions gave the appearance of brow-beating with the House passing the bill on Christmas Eve 2009 and the Senate confirming in March. The vote for ObamaCare, against the wishes of the majority of American taxpayers, proved to be the end of some political careers.

Because of multi-issue discontent, conventional thinking indicated Republicans would pick up the majority in the U.S. House of Representatives with conservative estimates of 47-52 seats going to the GOP. The new twist in November's elections is that a number of political pundits are now suggesting the U.S. Senate, once thought to be safely in Democratic hands, could also fall into Republican control. The GOP needs 10 seats and all estimates are giving them a relatively solid 8-seat gain with the possibility of one or two more. Republicans are also expected to add to their gubernatorial numbers with 6-8 pick-ups.

University of Virginia political professor and guru Larry Sabato sees a trend in past elections that suggests this could be another historic November:
If the Republican wave on November 2 is as large as some polls are suggesting it may be, then the surprise on election night could be a full GOP takeover. Since World War II, the House of Representatives has flipped parties on six occasions (1946, 1948, 1952, 1954, 1994, and 2006). Every time, the Senate flipped too, even when it had not been predicted to do so.
How could Barack Obama, the darling of the left who swept into office in 2008, fall so far so fast? Byron York, chief political correspondent for the Washington Examiner, looked at how the Democrats threw away their advantage over the GOP:
Many political observers were stunned by the new Gallup poll showing the Republican party with a 10-point advantage in the so-called "generic ballot" question. Now we have a better idea how that happened.

According to new, more detailed Gallup numbers, Democratic advantages on issues like health care, the economy, and handling corruption in government have simply disappeared. Democratic leads that were enormous when the party took control of Congress in 2006 have dwindled to nothing or have now become Republican advantages.
His article goes much more into detail, a good read for trying to understand what happened to the Democratic majority in Congress.

As America slips into the fall campaign season, a few Democrats cling to the hope that the outcome for their side will be better than predicted. However, others see the handwriting on the wall even as they study the polls and look at past elections and, perhaps most telling, as they look at the mood of America. November is coming and for Democrats that may spell disaster.

Originally published in The Washington Examiner on September 3, 2010

Monday, August 16, 2010

The wisdom of Reagan ...

... and the danger of the current Democratic Party.

"The problem with our liberal friends isn't that they're ignorant. It's that they know so much that isn't so." --President Ronald Reagan

Mark Hemmingway at The Washington Examiner also weighs in....

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Now this is mature ... Dems go after tea party (again)

Politico's Ben Smith reported this morning that the Democrat lefties have initiated the "F*ck Tea Project" campaign with the aim "to dismiss the Tea Party and promote the progressive cause."

Charming.

Politico wrote, "The new project, so far, features merchandise, polling statistics aimed to paint Tea Party members as ignorant, and a mocking video."

Well, of course. Same game, same play book ... the politics of personal destruction, something the liberals are all-too-familiar with. Think they'll be successful with this latest ploy? Heh.

Friday, July 30, 2010

Women's rights ... Taliban style

Via Allahpundit at Hot Air, the new Time magazine cover with a photo of a woman whose nose was cut off by the Taliban. But that's not all the horror she suffered. Check it out.

Friday, July 16, 2010

WaEx Editorial: "Holder should drop the Arizona Suit"

From today's Washington Examiner editorial:
Virginia is now the most recent of nine states to unite in opposition to Attorney General Eric Holder's politically charged suit against Arizona's recently enacted immigration law. Don't be surprised if more states join the Arizona cause because Holder is now adding insult to injury by threatening a second suit against Arizona. This one would charge Arizona with racial profiling if the federal courts allow the state's statute to go into effect as scheduled on July 29.

Wednesday, July 07, 2010

Ditto, ditto, ditto ... updated

Celebrities. We love them for their artistic ability ... and then they go and ruin it by opening their mouths and voicing their liberal opinions. Pat in Shreveport reports that Jimmy Buffett is the latest:
Oh for crying out loud, not Jimmy Buffett, too. Add him to my list of celebrities who have lowered my opinion of them by opening their mouths and uttering moonbat nonsense. The BP oil spill is all George Bush's fault.
I've been a long-time Parrothead but all I can say is "ditto" ... I agree with every word Pat writes. Read it all.

Update: Fishersville Mike has sage comments about this latest liberal to pile on George W. Bush. Meanwhile, Smitty at The Other McCain says, "Thanks, Buffett. The weather is here. Wish you were credible."

Buffet appears to have screwed up royally with his conservative fans. NewsBusters has the AP article that reveals backlash from Alabama residents and Buffett fans who want him to just shut up and sing and stop with the liberal, personal commentary.

Ditto.

I have my own question for Buffett: "How many bombs dropped on your head after 9/11?" Oh, that's right ... there have been none thanks to the strong leadership of George W. Bush at a time when terrorists attacked this country, killed 3,000 innocent people, and terrorized an entire nation.

I guess Buffett is still part of the generation that never grew up. Too bad. My Buffett music may have to be on hiatus for a while....

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Manipulated data? "Trust but verify"

So the Daily Kos has renounced its "polling data" as possibly fraudulent? Amazing especially because of the recently revealed global warming scandal where the data was cooked.

Barbara Hollingsworth opined in The Washington Examiner:
Markos Moulitsas, founder of the liberal Daily Kos blog, says he is suing Olney-based Research 2000 for allegedly fabricating weekly poll results after three “statistics wizards” questioned them. Based on concerns raised by self-described political consultant Mark Grebner, retired physicist Michael Weissman and wildlife research technician Jonathan Weissman, “it’s clear that we did not get what we paid for,” Moulitsas wrote on his website.

“We were defrauded by Research 2000, and while we don’t know if some or all of the data was fabricated or manipulated beyond recognition, we know we can’t trust it. Meanwhile, Research 2000 has refused to offer any explanation… I hereby renounce any post we’ve written based exclusively on Research 2000 polling.”

Apparently this also includes the 2010 Comprehensive Daily Kos/Research 2000 Poll of Self-Identified Republicans, which Moulitsas said found that 2/3 of Republicans “are completely insane."
Kind of gives renewed meaning to Ronald Reagan's quote, "Trust but verify."

Monday, April 19, 2010

Sedition?

Sedition: se·di·tion (noun) - incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority
Time's Joe Klein accused Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck of "seditious" behavior.

Oh, really?

There is not enough space to record the liberal examples of "seditious" behavior and comments if we go by Joe Klein's meaning. Check out Newsbusters' response to this ridiculous accusation.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Pelosi: Pass something ... anything! ... to have government controlled health care

The words have been read by many and, still, it is incredulous to realize the stupidity behind them. As David Freddoso reported in Wednesday's Washington Examiner, Democrats were determined government controlled health care had to be passed no matter what:
"[W]e have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it," said Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., as she rushed headlong toward passing President Obama's health care reform bill.
Now that the bill has been jammed down an unwilling American public's throats, the details are -- surprise! -- coming to light. As Mr. Freddoso wrote:
The predictable result: Weeks after it became law, we're still finding out what's in it, just like the speaker said.

Would you believe that Obamacare contains a tax increase on the sick and the old?

That in their rush to save face and pass a bill, members of Congress might have accidentally left themselves and staffers without a health plan?

That Obamacare does nothing to stop the huge premium increases that Obama pointed at to justify his bill?
It's maddening how predictable the Democrats are. Read the entire article here for full details about the three new surprises in the health care bill.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Support grows for repeal of health care bill

The poll numbers tell the tale:
Three weeks after Congress passed its new national health care plan, support for repeal of the measure has risen four points to 58%. That includes 50% of U.S. voters who strongly favor repeal.
Before its passage, a majority of Americans were against the health care bill. After Democrats ignored voters and jammed it through Congress, Rasmussen's numbers reveal that a majority of Americans now favor repeal:
Eighty-eight percent (88%) of Republicans and 54% of voters not affiliated with either major party favor repeal. Sixty-one percent (61%) of Democrats are opposed. Republican support for repeal is up eight points from a week ago, while Democratic opposition is down seven.

Ninety-four percent (94%) of those who consider themselves part of the Tea Party movement favor repealing the health care bill.
So far Americans appear to be holding firm on their desire to do away with the financial backbreaker that overreaches into their lives. Perhaps their anger at being ignored by Democrats will be seen at the ballot box this November.

Tuesday, April 06, 2010

Open letter to Sen. Jim Webb

This letter is reprinted with permission of the author. See Senator Webb's comments here.

Tuesday, April 06, 2010

Senator Webb,

I read a news story that indicated that you are having second thoughts about the cost of the Health Care bill after you were the deciding 60th vote that imposed this outrageous and unconstitutional bill on your constituents. Maybe it would have been better to express these doubts before you cast your “yea” vote in the middle of the night on Christmas Eve. I know that you received thousands of calls and e-mails from Virginians who pleaded with you to oppose this bill. Now you expect us to believe that you have doubts about your vote. I can guarantee you that your concerns fall on deaf ears, just as our pleas were ignored by you.

If you believe that we will forget in 2012 what you did in 2009 you are sadly mistaken. We will work tirelessly to do whatever it takes to insure that you never have another opportunity to ignore us again. Nothing you can say or do will put out this fire, millions of Virginians will oppose your re-election and you WILL be defeated. You wanted us to believe that you were a different type of politician but you proved with this vote that you do not represent the people you only represent your party. You should have listened to Virginians; it is too late now. Save your crocodile tears for your memoirs. Maybe a few people who read them will believe you.

You have switched parties twice before and now you want to switch your vote on this bill. Just where do you stand on anything? I have the utmost respect for your military service, but I have absolutely zero respect for you as a Senator. Hopefully after November you will be in the minority and can no longer have the deciding vote on legislation that is this absurd. You have proven with this vote that you are unfit to represent the people of Virginia.

Lawrence Tillett
Waynesboro, Va.

Monday, April 05, 2010

Chris Matthews' selective memory loss toward conservatives

Don't you just love liberals and their selective memories? MSNBC's Chris Matthews is the perfect example in the latest round between less-than-presidential Barack Obama and conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh ... and the Washington Examiner's Byron York didn't let him get away with it:
On Friday, I asked Rush Limbaugh for his response to President Obama's description of him as "troublesome" and of his program as "vitriol." Limbaugh told me he does not believe Obama is trying to do what is best for the country and added, "Never in my life have I seen a regime like this, governing against the will of the people, purposely."

By using the word "regime," Limbaugh was doing something he does all the time: throwing the language of the opposition back in their faces. In the Bush years, we often heard the phrase "Bush regime" from some quarters of the left. So Limbaugh applied it to Obama.
After Chris Matthews made a big deal about Rush's use of the word "regime," Mr. York researched the word and, amazingly, a quick search found that it was used frequently by liberal progressive types:
It appears that Matthews has suffered a major memory loss. I don't have the facilities to search for every utterance of Joe McCarthy, but a look at more recent times reveals many, many, many examples of the phrase "Bush regime." In fact, a search of the Nexis database for "Bush regime" yields 6,769 examples from January 20, 2001 to the present.
The search also revealed its use by Maureen Dowd and the Washington Post. Selective memory loss by Chris Matthews and others on the left? Read Byron York's entire column here.

Thanks to Cato at Delmarva Dealings for the link.

Friday, April 02, 2010

ObamaCare: redistribution of wealth

So was ObamaCare about health care ... or more about redistribution of wealth in America Byron York wrote in the Washington Examiner:
It hasn't attracted much notice, but recently some prominent advocates of Obamacare have spoken more frankly than ever before about why they supported a national health care makeover. It wasn't just about making insurance more affordable. It wasn't just about bending the cost curve. It wasn't just about cutting the federal deficit. It was about redistributing wealth.

Health reform is "an income shift," Democratic Sen. Max Baucus said on March 25. "It is a shift, a leveling, to help lower income, middle income Americans."
Obama joked after the bill was signed that no cracks showed up in the earth ... no meteors fell from the sky ... giving the impression that those opposed were fear-mongers.

The reality is worse but it will take years for its complete impact to be known. Meanwhile, we continue to morph into an entitlement nation, as shown by the Democratic National Committee:
This week the DNC group Organizing for America offered a commemorative certificate to supporters who helped pass the health care bill. The certificate said, "We achieved the dream of generations -- high-quality, affordable health care is no longer the privilege of a few, but the right of all."

The privilege of a few? It is widely accepted that about 85 percent of all Americans have health care coverage, and the overwhelming majority are happy with it. There's simply no way anyone could plausibly claim that health coverage is the privilege of a few.
I still maintain that health care is a privilege, not a right. Democrats think otherwise.

And Americans, asleep at the wheel for years, have allowed this creeping socialism to invade in little bits and pieces. What has happened to our country is the fault of all. The question is ... is it too late to turn back?

Time will tell.

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Binyamin Netanyahu ... defender of freedom

Artwork compliments of Bob at The Journey.

See Obama snubs another American ally.

Tea Party Express bus egged in Nevada ... message being delivered to DC

First Amendment rights for thee.... The Tea Party Express and crowds estimated up to 30,000 met Saturday in Searchlight, NV, home of Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid who helped jam health care reform down the throats of America, to kick off the latest "Tea Party Express -- Just Kick Them Out" cross-country tour to bring attention to ObamaCare and other overreaching government programs. They were reportedly met with eggs thrown at the bus by those who oppose their freedom of speech as Democrat SEIU members held directional signs pointing attendees in the wrong direction.

The Tea Party Express is carrying a message throughout America:
“You, the politicians in Washington, have failed We The People with your bailouts, out-of-control deficit spending, government takeovers of sectors of the economy, Cap & Trade, government-run health care, and higher taxes! If you thought we were just going to quietly go away, or that this tea party movement would be just a passing fad, you were mistaken. We’re taking our country back!”
The grassroots movement continues.

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Bob Goodlatte ... what does $1 trillion look like?

Congressman Bob Goodlatte talks with Christy Huffman at Shenandoah County GOP dinner.

Congressman Bob Goodlatte (R-6th CD, VA) addressed those who attended Friday night's Shenandoah County Republican dinner. The 9-term representative was part of the Republican fight to prevent ObamaCare from passing but Democrats pushed it through on a partisan vote.

Even now, he said, 62% of Americans want Congressional Republicans to continue fighting the health care reform bill with a rally cry of, "Repeal and Replace."

While talking recently with a group of high school students, the subject of the health care reform bill and its costs came up ... and those students realized they were the ones on whose shoulder the huge debt would fall ... and the shoulders of their children.

I'm a visual learner so I loved the example the Congressman gave to help students visualize what $1 trillion looks likes. After all, most people will never see anything near that amount of money.

Imagine, he told the students, that you had a 4-inch stack of $1,000 bills and that was $1 million. Four inches high ... how high would the stack be to have $1 trillion? After all, $1 trillion was what it cost for the stimulus package that was passed by Democrats in 2009, the bill that was supposed to save and/or create 2 1/2 million jobs but has instead lost 3 million jobs.

How high a stack would it be for $1 trillion? The stack would be 63 MILES high ... right up into outer space!

That is quite a visual.

Photo by SWAC Girl
Lynn Mitchell
26 March 2010

Friday, March 26, 2010

Obama snubs another U.S. ally

This is very troubling. Barack Obama, who represents the United States of America, walked out on a key ally who was visiting the White House. Fox News reported:
For a head of government to visit the White House and not pose for photographers is rare. For a key ally to be left to his own devices while the President withdraws to have dinner in private was, until this week, unheard of. Yet that is how Benjamin Netanyahu was treated by President Obama on Tuesday night, according to Israeli reports on a trip viewed in Jerusalem as a humiliation.

After failing to extract a written promise of concessions on settlements, Obama walked out of his meeting with Netanyahu but invited him to stay at the White House, consult with advisers and “let me know if there is anything new”, a U.S. congressman, who spoke to the Prime Minister, said.
Not only was he snubbed, but the fear of tapped phone lines caused Mr. Netanyahu to leave the White House for communication purposes, according to the Times of London:
With the atmosphere so soured by the end of the evening, the Israelis decided that they could not trust the telephone line they had been lent for their consultations. Mr Netanyahu and Ehud Barak, his Defence Minister, went to the Israeli Embassy to ensure that the Americans were not listening in.
This incident should be protested by Republican representatives because Barack Obama is endangering American national security by snubbing key allies while snuggling up to our enemies.

RNC's greetings for Nancy Pelosi's 70th birthday

From the Republican National Committee -- 70th birthday greetings to Nancy Pelosi....

Congratulations, you pushed it through,
Gamed the process and the CBO too!
But in response, your approval still wanes,
And now your title, Republicans claim.

Just hope that the voters don't remember
When they vote this upcoming November-
That Rahm, Harry, Barack - and you, Nancy
Passed this bill without transparency!

And covered up ethics scandals and more
From Rangel to Massa, and his tickle wars.
For kickbacks and gimmicks, budgets un-clipped
We give you this special Birthday pink slip.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Violent liberal left

"Me thinks thou doeth protest too much." Democrats are pointing fingers....

Tom White at Virginia Right! documented 55 acts of violence against the military alone.

Newsbusters weighs in.

Mike shares threats against President George W. Bush.

Richmond office for Republican House Whip Eric Cantor had a gunshot fired at it.

And, of course, Ann Coulter's speech this week in Canada was canceled by liberal protesters.

This is the tip of the iceberg. More to follow....